AI Scores / Tech & SaaS

Tech & SaaS AI Scores
Score Your Brand Free
πŸ’»

AI Visibility Scores for Tech and SaaS Brands

B2B buyers ask AI engines for software recommendations every day. The SaaS brands that show up have schema markup, entity clarity, and AI-accessible documentation. See how tech companies score on AI visibility.

1,026,201
Brands Scored
4.6/10
Industry Average
<1%
AI-Ready (8+)

Score Distribution - 1,026,201 Tech & SaaS Brands

AI-Ready8-10
<1%
5,423
Getting There6-7
18%
184,356
Needs Work4-5
69%
705,962
Not Discoverable0-3
13%
130,460

Only <1% of tech & saas brands are AI-ready.

The other >99% are being skipped by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode.

Score your brand free

1,026,201 brands scored - page 9158 of 10,263

P

pololu.github.io

3/10
Z

Zachary Yedidia

3/10
P

PySTAC Client Documentation β€” pystac

3/10
H

Hi, I'm Leo.

3/10
E

Etherpad

3/10
L

Login

3/10
T

Terminal++

3/10
M

man azdavis

3/10
W

Welcome β€” d8d

3/10
D

Donny Bertucci

3/10
J

J.A. Dahlke

3/10
K

Keiser Developer Zone

3/10
R

roblouie

3/10
T

TexasDex.com

3/10
W

WaterdogPE

3/10
P

Portfolio

3/10
S

Sumanth Dathathri's Homepage

3/10
Z

Zpix's Stuff

3/10
R

Raiden Network Specification β€” Raiden Specification 0.1 documentation

3/10
L

lda: Topic modeling with latent Dirichlet Allocation β€” lda documentation

3/10
A

AtmoSwing’s user documentation β€” AtmoSwing 3.0.x documentation

3/10
H

Home β€” Geographika

3/10
G

Gregor Richards

3/10
R

Ren'Py Nightly Builds

3/10
A

Alison Hardy

3/10
C

CHOOSE YOUR DESTINY

3/10
W

Welcome to the Official Cosmos Documentation

3/10
B

Brian Beckman

3/10
S

Seb Hillaire's website

3/10
G

Git Cola: The highly caffeinated Git GUI

3/10
W

Welcome to pyautocad’s documentation! β€” pyautocad 0.2.0 documentation

3/10
R

RepoCloud

3/10
B

Bradley J Eck, PhD

3/10
Y

YOLKALYZER by yyolk

3/10
H

Home

3/10
B

Bjornharrtell

3/10
J

jbr.github.com

3/10
G

Golangit!

3/10
P

place.dog

3/10
G

Go Farmer

3/10
L

libnacl: Python bindings to NaCl β€” libnacl 1.9.0 documentation

3/10
P

Python Library for Historical Linguistics β€” LingPy

3/10
C

Cheersgames

3/10
C

ComponentJS

3/10
S

Samsaccone

3/10
M

MichaelXavier.net

3/10
G

gpodder.net Documentation β€” gpodder.net documentation

3/10
I

ISF

3/10
G

GitHub Salesforce Deploy Tool

3/10
P

Pipelines as Code

3/10
C

CSX Structured JavaScript Learning Journey

3/10
C

chsxf.dev

3/10
P

pygsheets β€” pygsheets 1.1 documentation

3/10
W

Welcome to plastimatch β€” Plastimatch 1.10.0 documentation

3/10
A

Aaron Friesen

3/10
H

Home

3/10
P

peng :: About Me

3/10
C

Cake Software Foundation, Inc.

3/10
P

Peter Strahle

3/10
P

Pascal Grittmann

3/10
H

Homepage

3/10
E

eddex

3/10
H

Home

3/10
L

libreserver

3/10
D

Dalija Prasnikar

3/10
S

SDL3 Examples

3/10
J

Jim Grey on software management

3/10
D

DAViCal

3/10
M

Mastodon hosted on technodon.org

3/10
T

Tootpick

3/10
D

Dr. Stephan Meylan, Ph.D.

3/10
F

fossil.wanderinghorse.net: Documentation

3/10
A

ALPSCore: Applications and Libraries for Physics Simulations

3/10
L

LdBeth's Homepage

3/10
T

Tailwind CSS Typography

3/10
A

Arman Cohan

3/10
T

Terraforming Mars

3/10
T

Thoughts and notes on programming

3/10
E

EasyCLA

3/10
Q

quark

3/10
A

Apache BVal

3/10
R

rostrum.blog

3/10
G

GitHub

3/10
M

Mastodon hosted on mastodon.chriswiegman.com

3/10
M

MAP

3/10
A

Aferrero2707.github.io by aferrero2707

3/10
I

Issues

3/10
B

baumrock.com Web Development

3/10
H

HackerOne API

3/10
H

Home

3/10
A

About giraffe

3/10
β—‹

β—‹β–³β–‘

3/10
W

Welcome to x64dbg’s documentation! β€” x64dbg documentation

3/10
H

Home

3/10
G

Gitlab

3/10
D

Die QR

3/10
M

Manabu.tech

3/10
D

Documentation

3/10
L

LuCE Research Lab

3/10
O

obaby 𝐒‍𝐧⃝ void

3/10
Previous
1...9,1569,1579,1589,1599,160...10,263
Next
Score your tech & saas brand free

Want to improve your AI visibility score?

Read: AEO guide for Tech & SaaS brands β†’

What an AEO score of 4.6/10 means for tech & saas brands

The average Tech & SaaS brand we've scored sits at 4.6/10. That means roughly <1% are positioned to be cited by ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, while the remaining >99% are at risk of being skipped when AI engines answer customer questions.

Common AEO issues in tech & saas

  • Missing Organization JSON-LD with sameAs links to social profiles
  • No llms.txt file declaring the brand to AI crawlers
  • FAQ content rendered without FAQPage schema, so AI engines cannot extract it
  • robots.txt or Cloudflare WAF blocking GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or PerplexityBot
  • Thin About pages with no founder/team Person schema

How to improve your tech & saas AEO score

Run a free AEO score for your site and see exactly which signals are missing. The audit takes under a minute and the fix list ships as a one-click JSON-LD + llms.txt + robots.txt patch you can paste into any platform.

Tech & SaaS AI visibility by city

New York CityLos AngelesChicagoHoustonPhoenixPhiladelphiaSan AntonioSan DiegoDallasSan JoseAustinJacksonvilleSan FranciscoColumbusCharlotteIndianapolis

Browse by industry

πŸ›οΈ Ecommerce & Retail🍽️ Food & BeverageπŸ’ͺ Health & WellnessπŸ’… BeautyπŸ‘— Fashion & ApparelπŸ’° Finance & FintechAll brands β†’