AI Scores / Tech & SaaS

Tech & SaaS AI Scores
Score Your Brand Free
💻

AI Visibility Scores for Tech and SaaS Brands

B2B buyers ask AI engines for software recommendations every day. The SaaS brands that show up have schema markup, entity clarity, and AI-accessible documentation. See how tech companies score on AI visibility.

2,783,796
Brands Scored
4.1/10
Industry Average
<1%
AI-Ready (8+)

Score Distribution - 2,783,796 Tech & SaaS Brands

AI-Ready8-10
<1%
7,692
Getting There6-7
11%
312,106
Needs Work4-5
62%
1,722,688
Not Discoverable0-3
27%
741,310

Only <1% of tech & saas brands are AI-ready.

The other >99% are being skipped by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode.

Score your brand free

2,783,796 brands scored - page 81 of 27,838

M

Multilingual Natural Language Processing

7.9/10
T

The Apache OFBiz® Project

7.9/10
M

Mahrud Sayrafi

7.9/10
H

Hao Dong

7.9/10
B

Brave

7.9/10
M

Merchant Services & Payment Processing

7.9/10
A

AI4Society

7.9/10
V

Víctor Elvira's webpage

7.9/10
M

MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit

7.9/10
I

ICSME 21

7.9/10
D

David PS's Blog

7.9/10
C

CPM 2024

7.9/10
H

Homepage

7.9/10
A

AWS CLI Command Reference — AWS CLI 2.34.54 Command Reference

7.9/10
P

Program SIGdial & INLG 2023

7.9/10
A

A Python package & command

7.9/10
S

Spotify Open Source Projects

7.9/10
M

murmuring in the background

7.9/10
D

Decoding Models Visualizations

7.9/10
W

William He

7.9/10
M

MODEVAR@VARIABILITY 2026

7.9/10
F

For Our Colleagues

7.9/10
N

Norton AntiVirus, Privacy, Identity, & Advanced Scam Protection

7.9/10
J

Joseph Suarez

7.9/10
Y

Yixuan Huang

7.9/10
E

Enze Tao's Website

7.9/10
C

Chudi Zhong

7.9/10
T

Taegyoon Kim

7.9/10
M

Mintty — Cygwin Terminal emulator

7.9/10
M

Mitchell R. Vollger, Ph.D.

7.9/10
M

Marylou Gabrié / Home

7.9/10
U

USGS

7.9/10
G

GitHub Bug Bounty

7.9/10
T

The Python Package Index Blog

7.9/10
K

Karl Pertsch

7.9/10
C

Confessions of a Wall Street Programmer

7.9/10
F

Fiware

7.9/10
E

ELMAH—Home

7.9/10
R

Read the Docs

7.9/10
A

Amplify 日本ユーザーグループ

7.9/10
N

Nemanja's homepage

7.9/10
K

Kernel Planet

7.9/10
F

fusion2.corp.google.com

7.9/10
G

Get Started with DDEV

7.9/10
T

Theislab

7.9/10
I

Ivan Markovsky

7.9/10
Z

Zhensu Sun

7.9/10
C

Campbell Muscle Lab

7.9/10
F

Filippo Ascolani

7.9/10
W

WRLA 2026

7.9/10
A

ACL Student Research Workshop (SRW) 2023

7.9/10
M

Mevin Hooten

7.9/10
W

Woohyeok Kim

7.9/10
W

WiOpt 2024

7.9/10
A

Active Video Perception: Iterative Evidence Seeking for Agentic Long Video Understanding

7.9/10
B

BlenderFusion: 3D

7.9/10
P

Pengyuan Wang

7.9/10
E

ESGF Home Page

7.9/10
S

Silvio Moreto

7.9/10
P

Pbs

7.9/10
N

NAACL Student Research Workshop (SRW) 2025

7.9/10
O

Og Maciel’s Journal

7.9/10
O

Optimization unplugged 2025

7.9/10
C

Contributor License Agreement

7.9/10
S

SPARO Lab

7.9/10
C

Contributor License Agreement

7.9/10
O

Otten Group

7.9/10
M

Marissa Masden

7.9/10
M

MobileSafetyBench: Evaluating Safety of Autonomous Agents in Mobile Device Control

7.9/10
S

SegGen: Supercharging Segmentation Models with Text2Mask and Mask2Img Synthesis

7.9/10
M

Minghao Chen

7.9/10
A

Alex Gu

7.9/10
Y

Yu

7.9/10
A

Ankur Handa

7.9/10
A

Anna C. Nelson

7.9/10
R

Rémi Prébet

7.9/10
R

Raphael Mignot

7.9/10
C

Christian Carrick

7.9/10
C

Cristina Bratu

7.9/10
W

WEESR 2022

7.9/10
M

Medium

7.9/10
E

Examining Autoexposure for Challenging Scenes

7.9/10
G

Gaurish Korpal

7.9/10
I

InteNSE: Interpretability and Robustness in Neural Software Engineering

7.9/10
J

Jean

7.9/10
J

Julian Külshammer

7.9/10
L

lykelee

7.9/10
M

Martin Klissarov

7.9/10
A

About me

7.9/10
S

Samuel Schmidgall

7.9/10
H

Home

7.9/10
H

Home

7.9/10
D

Dian Chen

7.9/10
F

Flight by Twitter

7.9/10
J

Ji

7.9/10
V

Vevo

7.9/10
W

Welcome to Intern Robotics Documentation — Intern Robotics Documentation v0.0.1 documentation

7.9/10
I

IconQA

7.9/10
S

SPRIGHT

7.9/10
I

Inmite Developers

7.9/10
Previous
1...7980818283...27,838
Next
Score your tech & saas brand free

Want to improve your AI visibility score?

Read: AEO guide for Tech & SaaS brands →

What an AEO score of 4.1/10 means for tech & saas brands

The average Tech & SaaS brand we've scored sits at 4.1/10. That means roughly <1% are positioned to be cited by ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, while the remaining >99% are at risk of being skipped when AI engines answer customer questions.

Common AEO issues in tech & saas

  • Missing Organization JSON-LD with sameAs links to social profiles
  • No llms.txt file declaring the brand to AI crawlers
  • FAQ content rendered without FAQPage schema, so AI engines cannot extract it
  • robots.txt or Cloudflare WAF blocking GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or PerplexityBot
  • Thin About pages with no founder/team Person schema

How to improve your tech & saas AEO score

Run a free AEO score for your site and see exactly which signals are missing. The audit takes under a minute and the fix list ships as a one-click JSON-LD + llms.txt + robots.txt patch you can paste into any platform.

Tech & SaaS AI visibility by city

New York CityLos AngelesChicagoHoustonPhoenixPhiladelphiaSan AntonioSan DiegoDallasSan JoseAustinJacksonvilleSan FranciscoColumbusCharlotteIndianapolis

Browse by industry

🛍️ Ecommerce & Retail🍽️ Food & Beverage💪 Health & Wellness💅 Beauty👗 Fashion & Apparel💰 Finance & FintechAll brands →