AI Scores / Tech & SaaS

Tech & SaaS AI Scores
Score Your Brand Free
💻

AI Visibility Scores for Tech and SaaS Brands

B2B buyers ask AI engines for software recommendations every day. The SaaS brands that show up have schema markup, entity clarity, and AI-accessible documentation. See how tech companies score on AI visibility.

3,812,597
Brands Scored
3.7/10
Industry Average
<1%
AI-Ready (8+)

Score Distribution - 3,812,597 Tech & SaaS Brands

AI-Ready8-10
<1%
1,632
Getting There6-7
6%
242,805
Needs Work4-5
53%
2,022,267
Not Discoverable0-3
41%
1,545,893

Only <1% of tech & saas brands are AI-ready.

The other >99% are being skipped by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode.

Score your brand free

3,812,597 brands scored - page 46 of 38,126

U

UCLA Arts Conditional Studio

7.5/10
D

distantreading.github.io

7.5/10
Y

Yann Dubois

7.5/10
O

Open Source Software from SAS

7.5/10
L

Learning Rust

7.5/10
U

Unity

7.5/10
P

Pengyu Nie

7.5/10
T

TBE IT Support Group: Cornell Tech

7.5/10
T

Thomas Dohmke

7.5/10
A

Alex Wang

7.5/10
C

Cerebrations

7.5/10
W

Welcome to Jianfei Cai’s Personal Homepage

7.5/10
S

StompJS Family

7.5/10
B

Biopragmatics Stack

7.5/10

张小凯的博客

7.5/10
P

Personal Page of Juan Pablo Vielma

7.5/10
M

MIA: Workshop on Multilingual Information Access

7.5/10
T

trzsz

7.5/10
Z

Ziyu Liu

7.5/10
J

Jianwei Yang's Homepage

7.5/10
W

Welcome

7.5/10
J

Justin Bowen is TonsOfFun: Life should be tons of fun!!!InstagramDiscordInstagramDiscord

7.5/10
D

divan's blog

7.5/10
Y

Yinghao Xu (Justin)

7.5/10
L

Lugburz Sleed

7.5/10
M

Manoel Horta Ribeiro

7.5/10
B

Broadcom News and Stories

7.5/10
Y

Yue Yang

7.5/10
L

Lee Pike

7.5/10
A

antidote

7.5/10
J

Jared Forsyth.com | Jared Forsyth.com GitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub iconGitHub icon

7.5/10
P

Peng SONG

7.5/10
P

Proof General

7.5/10
M

MULA 2026

7.5/10
M

Matt Fisher

7.5/10
S

SubSonic Project

7.5/10
W

WordPress.org

7.5/10
J

Jiaqi Ma's Homepage

7.5/10
J

Jona Ruthardt

7.5/10
H

HeteroCL

7.5/10
A

Ahmad Sajedi

7.5/10
E

evcu

7.5/10
T

Tong He

7.5/10
H

Haoming Jiang

7.5/10
C

Chi Ian Tang

7.5/10
A

Aran Nayebi

7.5/10
Y

Yarden Cohen

7.5/10
S

Statistically Significant

7.5/10
M

M Baas

7.5/10
C

class LifeArchive { }

7.5/10
B

Bryce.Yu's Blog

7.5/10
X

Xin Xiong

7.5/10
P

Piyush Raj • Portfolio

7.5/10
A

Automation Tails from the FoxHole

7.5/10
R

Richard Si

7.5/10
L

Lyst Engineering Blog

7.5/10
S

So Yeon Tiffany Min

7.5/10
C

company

7.5/10
W

Water.css

7.5/10
S

S.Lott -- Software Architect

7.5/10
P

Protelis

7.5/10
N

Neurodata Without Borders

7.5/10
S

Sagar's Blog

7.5/10
H

Home

7.5/10
S

Shiva Aryal

7.5/10
S

SocialGouv

7.5/10
O

One world | Projects, maps and coding

7.5/10
U

UC2 ESP32 Firmware Flashing

7.5/10
F

First Workshop on Interactive Labeling and Data Augmentation for Vision

7.5/10
Z

Zoe Paraskevopoulou

7.5/10
D

Danel Ahman

7.5/10
S

Stephen Turner

7.5/10
J

Jan’s website and blog

7.5/10
T

Talia Ringer

7.5/10
K

Kaiqing Zhang's Homepage

7.5/10
U

UMR-CNRM.github.io

7.5/10
L

LNbits

7.5/10
D

D. Hicks

7.5/10
G

Guillotina: The Python AsyncIO REST API Framework — Guillotina 7.1.3 documentation

7.5/10
B

Bounded Rationality

7.5/10
S

S. Mahdi H. Miangoleh

7.5/10
F

From Imitation to Refinement—Residual RL for Precise Assembly

7.5/10
M

Mathics3

7.5/10
M

MadPlay🚀

7.5/10
D

DMLC

7.5/10
S

SMART Guidelines

7.5/10
Y

Yihan Wang

7.5/10
R

Rex Parsons

7.5/10
M

Matt Dancho's Data Science Portfolio

7.5/10
E

EasyHook

7.5/10
Z

Zhixuan Liu

7.5/10
E

Enze Chen (陈恩泽)

7.5/10
P

PerAct

7.5/10
B

Bevan Koopman's Homepage

7.5/10
M

Medium

7.5/10
H

Ham radio control library development

7.5/10
O

Olivier Harris

7.5/10
M

Martin Morgan

7.5/10
L

L3 Lab at CMU

7.5/10
J

Julia Belyakova · Purdue University

7.5/10
Previous
1...4445464748...38,126
Next
Score your tech & saas brand free

Want to improve your AI visibility score?

Read: AEO guide for Tech & SaaS brands →

What an AEO score of 3.7/10 means for tech & saas brands

The average Tech & SaaS brand we've scored sits at 3.7/10. That means roughly <1% are positioned to be cited by ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, while the remaining >99% are at risk of being skipped when AI engines answer customer questions.

Common AEO issues in tech & saas

  • Missing Organization JSON-LD with sameAs links to social profiles
  • No llms.txt file declaring the brand to AI crawlers
  • FAQ content rendered without FAQPage schema, so AI engines cannot extract it
  • robots.txt or Cloudflare WAF blocking GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or PerplexityBot
  • Thin About pages with no founder/team Person schema

How to improve your tech & saas AEO score

Run a free AEO score for your site and see exactly which signals are missing. The audit takes under a minute and the fix list ships as a one-click JSON-LD + llms.txt + robots.txt patch you can paste into any platform.

Tech & SaaS AI visibility by city

New York CityLos AngelesChicagoHoustonPhoenixPhiladelphiaSan AntonioSan DiegoDallasSan JoseAustinJacksonvilleSan FranciscoColumbusCharlotteIndianapolis

Browse by industry

🛍️ Ecommerce & Retail🍽️ Food & Beverage💪 Health & Wellness💅 Beauty👗 Fashion & Apparel💰 Finance & FintechAll brands →